The Legislature often does special things for veterans to show respect and thanks for their service, whether itís a break on hunting licenses or whatever, but every now and again, the Legislature doesnít do something for them that is even better.

Early in this session, a bill surfaced that would let veterans put on their driverís licenses a hologram ó not visible to the naked eye ó noting that they were veterans.

Sort of cool, we guess, and it was a voluntary deal that if for some reason you wanted a near-invisible notation on your driverís license that you were a veteran, well, you could get it.

Fortunately, that idea was scrapped.

While itís probably worth mentioning that putting a secret designation on a driverís license or non-driverís license state-issued identification card would cost the state about $95,000 in computer programming costs, the secret notation was killed for a better reason ó one not often discussed.

The key was what happens when law enforcement officers have a reason to ask a person to show a driverís license.

With the card-reading gear in most cop cars, that veteran notation would be visible to the law enforcement officers after they returned to their vehicle with the veteranís driverís license in hand to run whatever checks they run.

The veteranís notation: Does it become a reason for an officer to offer a friendly ďthank you for your serviceĒ or does the notation tell a cop that the person he/she has stopped might have been in an active war zone and might possibly be traumatized by interaction with law enforcement?

That notation changes things when itís learned in a situation where the driver faces some sort of sanction from law enforcement.

Itís not quite profiling of the potential reaction to law enforcement by drivers based on their exposure to violence in a war zone, but it would have been close.

Thatís a good reason that the bill is now history, stricken from the debate calendar. The voluntary decision by veterans that their basic piece of identification ó their driverís license or non-driverís identification card ó notes their service shouldnít be the reason that they are treated any differently than, say, an organ donor, who also has that noted on his/her license.

No, there wasnít any fuss about it, just a ruling from the Speaker of the House that a bill hadnít been acted upon by the deadline, and was stricken from the calendar ó essentially killed.

Every now and again, something right happens ... not easily explained, not anything that people want to discuss openly ó potentially profiling veterans as possibly dangerous.

But what could have been a mistake was avoided.

Martin Hawver is publisher of Hawverís Capitol Report. Visit his website at