Mobile Edition
Day-Night, Moon Phases

Suggest a poll topic

What’s the real story behind lawmakers push for voter ID laws?

GOP manipulation

A recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling gives a green light to states, including Kansas, bent on passing voter ID laws. But neither the court majority nor the backers of the Kansas legislation have shown much evidence that voter identification fraud is a problem in need of a solution.

Justice John Paul Stevens, writing for the majority, could produce only scant and anecdotal evidence of in-person voter fraud. He cited two cases in 140 years, which doesn’t exactly add up to a crisis.

There’s ample reason to worry that this issue is driven by partisan politics. GOP backers support the law, say critics, mainly to suppress turnout among (likely Democratic) low-income, elderly and minority voters.

The 2005 Indiana law at issue requires voters to present government-issued ID, in most cases either a driver’s license or passport. ...

In his dissent, Justice David Souter noted that 43,000 Indiana residents lacked the right ID card.

In Kansas, proponents of an ID law raise fears of illegal immigrants voting. But it is more likely that the new law would discourage U.S. citizens from voting. ...

If Kansas lawmakers are intent on passing a voter ID law, they should retain features in a House version of the bill that would provide photo IDs to low-income Kansans — and they should phase in enforcement over several years to give voters time to adjust.

It’s reassuring that disabled residents and those age 65 and over are exempt in the bill. Another good compromise is a provision to allow a broader scope of documents, such as student cards and employee badges, to meet the ID requirement.

Still, Gov. Kathleen Sebelius should veto any voter ID bill that discourages the most vulnerable members of our society from exercising their rights at the ballot box.

That’s also election fraud.



— The Wichita Eagle

E-mail this story to a friend | Print this article |
Enjoy the convenience of home delivery of The Ottawa Herald.


To post a new comment click here

Report an Offensive Comment

At www.ottawaherald.com, we are pleased to offer readers an opportunity to comment on articles. Readers are encouraged to engage in a lively, robust and civil debate -- as if comments were being submitted as verified letters for publication in print. Comments should not use names or otherwise identify private individuals or businesses. Avoid profanity and unfounded personal attacks. All comments will be subject to review before posting, but we cannot promise that readers will not find offensive or inaccurate comments. You will observe a delay between your writing a comment and its appearance on the site. Responsibility for posted statements lie with those who submit the comments, not The Ottawa Herald or www.ottawaherald.com. If you find a comment you believe to be objectionable, please report a comment by e-mail. We will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded that, in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on the Web site.


To post a new comment click here

0 comment(s)
Check out this blog by clicking now.