OttawaHerald.com -- Community News. Community Connections.

	Franklin County, Kansas, USA

Subscriber Services Home Delivery Gift Subscription Stop-Start Delivery Missing Paper Back Issues Newsstand Locations Shopper Locations

Advertising Services Manage Your Account Place a Classified Ad Place a Display Ad Advertise Online Business Finder Directory

Other Services Submit News Laminated Items Photos & Keepsakes Article Archives Contact Us History of the Herald Our Policies

Suggest a poll topic

2009-11-21

2009-11-18

2009-11-05

Agriculture

Lifestyles

Thursday, September 10, 2009 11:46 AM

Official: Intermodal pollution unlikely to impact local prospects

By The Herald Staff and the Associated Press

Concerns about increased air pollution in the area from a proposed railway intermodal probably won’t have much impact in Franklin County, a local economic development expert said.

Air-quality experts in Kansas City joined other groups about concerns over a Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway proposal to build a freight center in Johnson County.

The Kansas City Star reports that experts with the Mid-America Regional Council say diesel emissions from the rail project near Gardner would increase air pollution in the area, where it already exceeds federal air standards.

But those concerns mostly affect Kansas City and likely would not extend to Franklin County, Tom Weigand, president of the Ottawa Area Chamber of Commerce, said.

More of a concern, he said, is the trouble BNSF has with area officials over bringing the intermodal to the area.

“It’s just amazing that they are having such a difficult time developing this in the Gardner area,” he said.

The city of Gardner recently withdrew support for the project, which is now being considered by the city of Edgerton.

Environmental concerns have been debated, especially in the past month or so.

MARC has submitted its concerns about the air-quality issues in public comments to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The corps is deciding whether to allow the BNSF to build a $750 million freight hub. The intermodal facility would allow the movement of goods between trucks and trains.

MARC is challenging an initial conclusion from the corps that the only serious pollution issue from the freight hub would be dust from vehicles using the site.

MARC officials contend diesel emissions from the rail yard would increase the level of fine particles of pollution, which are considered more hazardous than dust and other larger particles of pollution because they can enter the body more easily and cause respiratory problems.

BNSF Railway has said the initial report from the corps shows that ozone-threatening emissions from the rail yard would decrease substantially in the hub’s first two decades of operation.

The project won’t result in ‘‘significant changes to ozone-causing emissions in the greater Kansas City area,’’ the railroad said in a statement.

The railroad company also said it is working to reduce pollution at the site. Locomotives and trucks won’t idle as much and cranes used there will be powered by electricity, not diesel fuel.

But MARC experts told the corps in a letter sent last month that activity at the rail yard will create health problems. They said diesel exhaust includes fine particles that can aggravate asthma, cause irregular heartbeats and possibly even cause early death to people with heart or lung disease.

The BNSF project ‘‘is introducing that kind of pollution to an area that doesn’t have that kind of pollution other than from the interstate,’’ Amanda Graor, a senior air quality planner at MARC, said.

Environmental concerns prompted a few hundred residents to attend a meeting of national environmentalists last month to discuss the project’s health risks.

The forum came weeks after the corps said the rail yard would have some moderate to significant adverse effects on air quality, traffic and streams, but BNSF was working to reduce any impact.

The report found the chance of contracting cancer from pollution from the rail yard was less than a person’s overall chance of developing cancer in a typical lifetime.

In a public comment period that ended Aug. 16, environmentalists argued that federal regulators underestimated the number of trucks that would use the hub and the amount of pollution they would cause.

They also said the corps didn’t fully assess the cancer risk and other rail projects had caused significantly more diesel emissions than the corps was predicting from the Gardner hub.

E-mail this story to a friend | Print this article |
Enjoy the convenience of home delivery of The Ottawa Herald.

Official: Intermodal pollution unlikely to impact local prospects

By The Herald Staff and the Associated Press

E-mail this story to a friend | Print this article | Enjoy the convenience of home delivery of The Ottawa Herald.

E-mail this story to a friend | Print this article |
Enjoy the convenience of home delivery of The Ottawa Herald.